SCROLL DOWN THIS INTRO TO GET TO MY BLOG POSTS, THANKS.


Most of what I write about is a combination of both the natural world and the spiritual world and while I agree with most of modern science to date, I do think there is also a spiritual layer to reality.


Sift through the PAGES and POSTS for more interesting information guaranteed to make you think and question.


FYI:


#1 Nothing is No Information

#2 Something is Some Information

#3 NoThing is Infinite/Unlimited information


Be careful how you understand NOTHING to be and how the word is used when you read my pages and articles on the web. I hold that the true vacuum energy of our universe and of in fact everything is from NOTHING of Infinite Information, is dynamic, and full --not empty, stagnate, and of zero information.


All the information collected from this process of existence and life is also retained inside of the Nothing. Who knows how many times existence and life have happened. I don't think information is lost or destroyed, and I don't think it returns into a zero-information kind of nothing.


Both understandings of nothing look very similar. They are both undefinable, unquantifiable, immeasurable...but they are opposites. The difference between zero and infinity.


FYI: There is One thing all of life wants, even human life and that is the effects of LOVE.



Joke

Joke

Nothing- Nothing and everything are but different forms of the same.

Nothing- Nothing and everything are but different forms of the same.
Nothing is everything, but everything is not nothing.

From Spirit to Nature

From Spirit to Nature

A Theist's Early Universe


MY cause : Eternal Infinite Illimitable Spirit closed
Atheists' cause: Eternal (possibly infinite and illimitable) Quantum Fluctuations or MultiVerse or Gravity Field?

 But whether we say the QF is eternal or the MV is eternal or the GF is eternal, it seems all would have originally had to have come from nothing.
If one says quantum fluctuations are eternal (As I've heard Krauss say), I would say they are a result of virtual particles which are a result of nothingness -or the absence of everything. Therefore, really what is eternal is nothingness.

If one says multiverse is eternal, I'd say our evidence shows us that our own universe evolved, had a beginning and so it seems likely that other universes did too and that the universe itself is not eternal, the multiverse is not eternal, it is the byproduct of the eternal nothingness.

 The Gravity Field is what happens when Quantum Mechanics is applied to Space-Time. (So, I'm told). It warps. This just shows us that Space-Time is in fact gravity- that they are connected. I already agree to this. But if one is saying that Space-Time is in fact eternal, in the form of a gravity field, I'd have to ask where these virtual particles are coming from still. Oh, yeah, nothing. So, we still have an eternal nothingness.  Also- I'd have to wonder how Space-Time can be eternal when Big Bang shows us it is not and that it had a beginning.

 The only way science is getting around this is if they can tear down Big Bang theory and in its place have a strong theory of the universe Space-Time and its eternal quality. Only then could we say that something is truly eternal. But still, all that "stuff" is still coming out of virtual particles from nothingness. 

From Science and my speculations:

A Void formed (Absolute Nothingness) and popped because nothingness is unstable and must form something. It is harder, it seems, for nothingness to exist than for something to exist. We see this because nothing can't be just nothing. It has to spit out virtual particles all the time and we see how much energy this is, how much it is working, by the mass we detect when virtual particles interact with the fields, primarily Higgs (vacuum) but also the strong force (protons).
So, the energy of nothing is much more than the energy of something. 

 Nothing takes a lot of work! Because it takes so much work and so much energy, I have to wonder where all this energy is coming from? If absolute nothingness can exist prior to big bang, that makes me think the energy source would have to be infinite. One, because without space time the energy density becomes infinite, but also by what we see of the energy of empty space. 

Had to have some force expanding (dark energy). 
Gravity exists wherever there is Space-Time, I think.  

 Space-Time has dark energy and gravity. It is a dual package. 

Space-Time (Gravity Field) is like the boundary of the rubber balloon.

Dark energy is like the air blown into the balloon expanding it and giving it virtual particles. 

(Gravity acts on the big and is within the fabric of space and time unlike the 3 forces of quantum mechanics which work on the small and are not interconnected to time, but also I think they evolved from the fields as more particles formed; where as gravity is a product of Space-Time, the forces are a product of the particles interaction with Higgs field and gravity field.) ---this is the void and darkness, Genesis 1 (invisibility/chaos/random)


Space-Time inflated/expanded and Higgs Field came out of inflation and turned on (giving particles mass which allows them to be "visible" because they now have characteristics which distinguishes them from others and they will bundle with others or not and get bigger and occupy space- in cooling, virtual particles became fundamental particles ...also the particles are now acting in gravity and Higgs fields.  ---this is the waters and when God said let there be light, Genesis 1 (visibility/order/non random)

As things slowed and cooled more, the particles condensed more and began to follow the forces.  ---this is the division of light from darkness, Genesis 1




Questions:

 How does nothingness exist at all? it seems it would require far more energy and work then existence of something itself? 

 Where did Gravity come from? I think from the appearance of Space-Time itself. 
When did it come? With Space-Time and can act on just one particle I think. 

 How did Higgs form? During Inflation...other fields may have evolved as particles multiplied and acted on each other.  

 Could fundamental particles have come from virtual particles? I think so. 

 The 3 forces existed as one when two particles appeared. I think the forces evolved from the interaction of the particles on the Gravity and Higgs field. Then this evolution branched as more fields formed and more force carrier particles formed.  

From Genesis:
Then...the earth was unformed and void, darkness was on the surface of the deep...and the spirit of God hovered over the surface of the abyss. The God Said, Let there be light." And there was light. God saw that the light was good and he divided the light from the darkness...

From Kabbalist Lucia: (500 years or more prior to modern science)

 http://www.newkabbalah.com/Tzimtzum.html
http://www.hebrew4christians.com/Articles/kabbalah/Creation/creation.html



"The world, according to Lurianic Kabbalah, is not so much a something which has been created from nothing, but rather a genre of nothingness resulting from a contraction or concealment of the only true reality, which is God." 

"Kabbalistic tradition is clear that God or "Ein-sof" does not originally exist within space and time. Indeed, it is only through the originalTzimtzum that space, time, matter and light come into being at all."

"Our understanding of Tzimtzum can be clarified through an analogy from the world of mathematics. An infinite perfect mind sees immediately that the arithmetical expressions 21/3, 126/18, 6.72 + .28, etc., etc., are all equivalents of the number 7: it is only from the point of view of a limited intellect that these expressions appear to represent different mathematical ideas. Indeed, as the mathematical philosophers Russell and Whitehead painstakingly demonstrated, all of mathematics is predicated on a very small number of logical principles, and an infinite mind would in an instant intuit the entire world of higher mathematics as an elaboration of the simplest of ideas. So it is with the world."

(Sounds like a Quantum Consciousness to me)

"Creation does not involve a limitation in the divine being, which remains completely intact, but rather a limitation in knowledge of the Divine: an estrangement of certain points within the "world" from the knowledge that all is One. God does not change in His being, it is rather that His presence is obscured. He is not completely known in a certain region of Being, and that region of Being becomes our world."

"Space, time and matter as well as individual personal existence are the logical consequence of Tzimtzum as concealment or epistemic limitation. For each of these "categories" serve as a vehicle through which knowledge is limited."


So, we  cam understand also through more study of this, that the energy has different levels, and the world we see and experience is the lowest level of this energy. The higher forms of the energy are NOT SEEN.

 It is truly amazing these ideas were close to 500 years ago as recored, probably older verbally, because we see in modern science that there are aspect of energy that is unseen and this is a reality of nature itself!


No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

What is God?

For myself, I view God as a Spirit. An infinite, illimitable, eternal Spirit. What is a Spirit? For myself, I view a Spirit as the most fundamental form, most simple form of energy.

I think to call the Spirit/God as intelligent or conscious, restricts and limits our own understanding of it. This is because we view life and nature through our own intelligence and consciousness. Ours evolved naturally from simple to complex and is restricted by body/space/time.

A God would not have these limits, would not have evolved and would not be complex. Therefore its "intelligence" and "conscious" would be nothing like we understand.

God is not a consciousness inside a brain or an intelligence inside a brain or even a mind inside a brain. Though a mind might be the closest we can think of it. God would exist outside of space and time and inside of it; therefore, its "consciousness" would encompass past-present-future and even before time. Its intelligence could be much like a mathematical genius quantum computer. Perhaps an Awakened Energy-Spirit- would be a better definition.

There are two kinds of energy in my view. Spiritual and Physical. When we understand virtual particles and fundamental particles better, I think we come closer to understanding what Spiritual Energy can do as well.

Spiritual Energy >>Withdrawal>>Space Forms>>Physical Energy Emerges>>Fields> Virtual Particles> Forces>Fundamental Particles>Everything Physical Forms.

Science examines the natural/the physical, not the spiritual.

I agree with everything from science, except when biologists (not mathematicians) use words like purposeless, without guide, directionless, without goals.

I agree with mathematicians assessment of randomness.

The reason is because in biology, we are talking about things without a consciousness -processes and mechanisms are non living things and can't have a purpose in the sense that they are using the word. They don't have a consciousness. They are not aware.

We are examining processes and mechanisms, but what is this substance (energy) that these processes and mechanisms are using. From where does this substance (energy) come?

Those are essentially the questions at the crust of the real inquiry into what is reality.

Simply because the process or mechanism is not conscious itself, does not mean they were not structured deliberately or without intent or thought, or that a spiritual energy does not exist.

This simply means that physical things and processes and mechanisms without a consciousness don't have a conscious purpose/goal.

Well, Duh.

So, I agree biological evolution doesn't have a conscious purpose/goal in and of itself -because we are examining only the physical Things, the physical processes and physical mechanisms.

This says nothing about the spiritual significance.

However, they do have a natural purpose/goal.

All energy persists toward entropy =Death.
All life persists to survival =Life

Further, all energy follows a pattern from simple>complex, chaos>order, from heterogenous>homogenous, from random>non random, from death>life>death.

These patterns are reflected in our natural laws.

So, all of energy does follow a guide or a direction. It is the direction or reflection of the natural laws.

is Nothing all there is?

Science seems to be going in the direction that true nothingness does not exist. This is because whenever you find nothing, you find virtual particles.

I would have to agree not just with the science, but with that concept in my view of life and reality.

Nothing does not exist, because whenever you find nothing--you actually find everything just in its most simple and fundamental form. Nothing is NoThing, not the non-existence of everything.

The most simple and fundamental form of reality is NoThing and this is why this happens in my opinion.

The real question for me is, how much of life experience and memories is retained in this simple fundamental form that makes up our universe and our everything?

How is it retained?

We can see cells seem to have a sense of memory and experience, but do virtual particles too?

Do all our memories and life experiences retain themselves in some fundamental form of energy?

Could what we call the soul or spirit be an echo of nature itself?

It does seem that virtual particles have to behave certain ways. It pops as a gluon only to become a photon or such...because it seemingly has to conform to the existence it pops into. Some virtual particles might pop into our existence as anti-quarks, but most have to conform and so we see the photon it is supposed to be.

Why do virtual particles conform? What rules are they following? It seems they are somehow aware of what is around them if they are conforming. (Not to imply this awareness has to be conscious.)